MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION:
Appearance: Patient is
cooperative
WITHDRAWN
HOSTILE
OVER FRIENDLY
SECRETIVE
EVASIVE
SUSPICIOUS
APATHETIC
EASILY DISTRACTED
FOCUSED
DEFENSIVE
DEMANDING
SEDUCTIVE
-
,
alert,
LETHARGIC,
SLEEPY,
STUPUROUS,
COMATOSE,
and oriented to time, place and person
OBTUNDED
DISORIENTED
HYPERALERT
-
,
dressed appropriately for age and season
POORLY KEMPT
appropriately dressed
INAPPROPRIATELY DRESSED
appropriately groomed
INAPPROPRIATELY GROOMED
DISHEVELED appearance
-
,
with normal posture
with SLUMPED posture
with RIGID posture
with TENSE posture
-
.
Patient
is OBESE
is OVERWEIGHT
is UNDERWEIGHT
is EMACIATED
appears OLDER THAN STATED AGE
appears YOUNGER THAN STATED AGE
has DYSMORPHIC features
is UNSHAVEN
has WOUNDS
has SCARS
has BLOOD STAINS
has BRUISES
has BANDAGES
is in RESTRAINTS
has TATTOOS
has worn JEWELLERY
has glasses
has dental braces
has missing LIMB
is REEKING OF SMELL OF ALCOHOL
emanates BODY ODOUR
has worn SOILED CLOTHES
has EXCORIATIONS
has INFESTATIONS
has INJECTION TRACK MARKS
has signs of SELF HARM
is UNDRESSED
is UNDERDRESSED
is OVERDRESSED
is BIZARRELY DRESSED
has worn UNIFORM
was TEARFUL during interview
.
Behavior: Psychomotor activity appears
normal
ABNORMAL
RESTLESS
AGITATED
RETARDED
HYPERACTIVE
PECULIAR
IMPULSIVE
CATATONIC
-
.
Patient
has no epse
has no abnormal involuntary movements
has FINE TREMORS
has FINE TREMORS IN OUTSTRETCHED HANDS
has COARSE TREMORS
has PERIORAL TREMORS
has RESTING TREMORS
has ACTION TREMORS
has INTENTION TREMOR
has MOTOR TICS
has CHOREA
has ATHETOID MOVEMENTS
has DYSTONIA
has MYOCLONUS
has reduced ARM SWING
has walks WITH A LIMP
has SHUFFLING GAIT
needs ASSISTANCE for ambulation
is on a WHEELCHAIR
is on a STRETCHER
was observed FORMICATING
was observed PULLING THREADS FROM CLOTHES
was observed SELF-MUTTERING
was observed GESTURING IN AIR
suggestive of HALLUCINATORY BEHAVIOR
demonstrates STEREOTYPIES
demonstrates MANNERISM
demonstrates WAXY FLEXIBILITY
demonstrates POSTURING
demonstrates GRIMACING
demonstrates MITMACHEN
demonstartes MITGEHEN
demonstartes GEGENHALTEN
demonstrates NEGATIVISM
demonstrates ECHOPRAXIA
demonstrates AUTOMATISM
demonstrates AMBITENDENCY
demonstartes PSYCHOLOGICAL PILLOW
Pseudoseizure could be elicited with suggestion
Movement disorder could be elicited with suggestion
demonstrates hysterical
paralysis
parasthesia
ataxia
blindness
aphonia
other conversion features
Suggestibility was tested using
falling backward suggestion
tired eyelid test
hand sticking test
circle test
.
Speech: Patients speech
is spontaneous
is NON-SPONTANEOUS
shows PAUCITY
shows POVERTY
is MUTE
-
,
with normal reaction time
with INCREASED REACTION TIME
with DECREASED REACTION TIME
with VARIABLE REACTION TIME
-
,
normal rate
RAPID rate
SLOWED rate
PRESSURED
-
,
appropriate volume
LOUD volume
SOFT volume
WHISPHER
VARIABLE volume
MONOTONE
-
,
with no problems expressing self
with
with no problems expressing self,
SLURRING
STAMMERING
TREMULOUS VOICE
MUMBLING
DIFFICULTY FINDING WORDS
LOW VOCABULARY
NEOLOGISM
ECHOLALIA
PERSEVERATION
DYSPROSODY
DYSARTHRIA
ANOMIA
MOTOR APHASIA
SENSORY APHASIA
GLOBAL APHASIA
APHASIA
.
Affect & Mood: Presents with
appropriate eye contact
HESITANCE TO MAKE eye contact
AVOIDANT eye contact
INTENSE eye contact
INTERMITTENT eye contact
-
,
euthymic
ANXIOUS
DEPRESSED
DYSPHORIC
IRRITABLE
ELEVATED
EXPANSIVE
ELATED
EUPHORIC
ANGRY
HOSTILE
INDIFFERENT
DETACHED
ANIMATED
MASKED
affect which is
full
RESTRICTED
BLUNTED
FLAT
EXPANSIVE
-
,
even
LABILE
-
,
and congruent with
and INCONGRUENT with
-
reported mood
(inferred as
euthymic
NOT REPORTED
ANXIOUS
DEPRESSED
DYSPHORIC
IRRITABLE
ELEVATED
EXPANSIVE
ELATED
EUPHORIC
ANGRY
HOSTILE
INDIFFERENT
DETACHED
ANIMATED
-
).
Thought process:
was linear
CIRCUMSTANTIAL
TANGENTIAL
COULD NOT BE ASSESSED.
,
coherent
INCOHERENT
,
and goal directed
with
PREOCCUPATIONS
RUMINATIONS
RACING THOUGHTS
FLIGHTS OF IDEAS
PROLIXITY
CLANG ASSOCIATIONS
LOOSE ASSOCIATIONS
THOUGHT BLOCKING
WORD SALAD
PERSEVERATION
NEOLOGISMS
IRRELEVANT ANSWERS
CONCRETE IDEAS
.
Thought content: no delusion on current evaluation,
Thought content: DELUSION PRESENT,
Thought content COULD NOT BE EVALUATED.
denies for suicidal ideations,
SUICIDAL IDEATIONS PRESENT,
DEATH WISHES PRESENT,
denies for homicidal ideations.
HOMICIDAL IDEATIONS PRESENT.
.
Patient harbours
WORRIES
FEARS
PREOCCUPATIONS
RUMINATIONS
SOMATIC PREOCCUPATIONS
PHOBIA
SITUATIONAL ANXIETY
LOW SELF ESTEEM
NEGATIVE COGNITIONS
SELF BLAME
EGOMANIA
MONOMANIA
HYPOCHONDRIACAL THOUGHTS
OBSESSION
COMPULSION
OVERVALUED IDEAS
PARANOID IDEAS
OVERVALUED IDEAS OF PERSECUTION
OVERVALUED IDEAS OF REFERENCE
RAISED SELF ESTEEM
GRANDIOSE IDEAS
DELUSION OF PERSECUTION
DELUSION OF REFERENCE
DELUSION OF CONTROL
DELUSION OF INFIDELITY
DELUSION OF GRANDIOSE
SOMATIC DELUSION
NIHIISTIC DELUSION
DELUSION OF GUILT
DELUSION OF POVERTY
DELUSION OF INFESTATION
DELUSION OF LOVE
DELUSIONAL MISIDENTIFICATION
CAPGRAS DELUSION
FREGOLI DELUSION
THOUGHT INSERTION
THOUGHT BROADCASTING
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
MOOD CONGRUENT
MOOD INCONGRUENT
BIZARRE
SYSTEMATIZED
BODY IMAGE ISSUES
IDEAS THAT IS TOO FAT
IDEAS THAT IS TOO THIN
SEXUAL PREOCCUPATIONS
MASTURBATION WORRIES
EMISSION WORRIES
.
Perception:
No perceptual abnormalities on current evaluation.
No Hallucinations on current evaluation.
HALLUCINATION PRESENT.
Perception COULD NOT BE ASSESSED.
Patient
demonstrates AUDITORY HALLUCINATIONS
simple
noises
music
voices
male
female
both male and female
inside head
outside head
from near
from far distance
clear
whispering
1st person
2nd person
3rd person
derogatory content
pleasant content
commanding
causing distress
patient acts on commands
patient resists commands
,
demonstrates VISUAL HALLUCINATIONS
demonstrates LILLIPUTIAN HALLUCINATIONS
demonstrates OLFACTORY HALLUCINATIONS
demonstrates TACTILE HALLUCINATIONS
demonstrates PHANTOM LIMB
demonstrates GUSTATORY HALLUCINATIONS
SYNESTHETIC/REFLEX HALLUCINATIONS
CENESTHETIC HALLUCINATIONS
EXTRACAMPINE
AUTOSCOPIC
MOOD CONGRUENT
MOOD INCONGRUENT
FUNCTIONAL
PSEUDOHALLUCINATION
HYPNOGOGIC
HYPNOPOMPIC
reported HYPERAESTHESIA
reported HYPOACUSIS
reported VISUAL DISTORTION
reported MICROPSIA
reported MACROPSIA
reported ILLUSION
reported FANTASTIC ILLUSION
reported PAREDOLIA
reported DEREALIZATION
reported DEPERSONALIZATION
reported DISSOCIATION
reported ABNORMAL EXPERIENCE OF PASSAGE OF TIME
.
Insight:
appears fair.
appears IMPAIRED.
appears POOR.
COULD NOT BE ASSESSED.
Judgment:
appears fair.
appears IMPAIRED.
appears POOR.
COULD NOT BE ASSESSED.
Cognition: appears grossly intact,
Cognition: appears grossly intact.
Cognition: appears ABNORMAL with,
Cognition: assessment DEFERRED.
Cognition: COULD NOT BE ASSESSED.
based on the ability to attend during the interview process
understand the questions and respond
recall verifiable historical information.
with appropriate attention span and concentration
intact ability to recall recent and remote information
normal abstraction.
Cognition:
Bedside Cognitive Assessment Schedule
Patient was DISORIENTED to
person
place
time
day of week
date
month
year
orientation
During interview patient appeared
attentive.
DISTRACTIBLE.
APATHIC.
Attention and concentration was assessed using
digit span
serial seven subtraction from 100
serial three subtraction from 30
serial one subtraction for 20
naming of month backwards
naming of days of weeks backwards
spelling word backwards
. Attention and concentration was intact.
. Had PROBLEMS WITH ATTENTION AND CONCENTRATION.
attention and concentration
Perseveration was assessed using
copying of changing patterns
repeating number letter combination
tapping a letter A
. Did not show perseveration
. SHOWED SIGNS OF PERSEVERATION
perseveration
Immediate recall was tested by
3 word repetition
brief paired associate test
learning of name and address
figure drawing
. Immediate memory was intact
. IMMEDIATE MEMORY WAS IMPAIRED
immediate memory
Recent memory was tested by
delayed 3 word repetition
delayed brief paired associate recall
delayed recall of name and address
delayed figure drawing
asking the patient to describe last meal
. Recent memory was intact
. RECENT MEMORY WAS IMPAIRED
recent memory
Remote memory was tested by
recall of historic events
recall of personal verifiable information
. Remote memory was intact
. REMOTE MEMORY WAS IMPAIRED
remote memory
Language was assessed by
having him/her write
having him/her repeat sentences
observing the patients fluency
having him/her carry our commands
having him/her name parts of objects
having him/her read and comprehend
. The patient did not have any
aphasia
alexia
agraphia
. The patient showed signs of
APHASIA
ALEXIA
AGRAPHIA
language
Agnosia was assessed for by
writing letter on patients hand
having him/her identify coins
having him/her name his fingers
having him/her point to right and left body parts
. The patient did not have agnosia.
. The patient showed signs of AGNOSIA.
agnosia
Apraxia was assessed for by asking the patient to perform action
such as blow out a match stick(buccofacial)
use a hammer(limb)
swing a bat(body)
act of toothbrushing(ideational)
draw or copy figure(s)
draw a clock face
. The patient did not have apraxia.
. The patient showed signs of APRAXIA.
apraxia
Considering patients educational background calculation ability was assessed using
simple addition and multiplication
slightly difficult arithmetic
without using paper and pencil
difficult arithmetic using paper and pencil
. Patient did not show dyscalculia.
. Patient showed signs of DYSCALCULIA.
calculation
Executive functions were assessed using
think about similarities
proverb interpretation
set generation (letter)
set generation (animal)
Luria motor test
Go-no-go test
frontal release reflexes
frontal lobe function
Visual agnosia was assessed for by
matching test
incomplete letter test
matching dissimilar objects
having him/her identify faces of famous people
color naming
color pointing
global letter test
mixed figure test
. The patient did not have visual agnosia.
. The patient showed signs of VISUAL AGNOSIA.
visual agnosia
Result - Copy or Print this text: